Go Back   CMP Forums > CMP Competitions > National Match AR
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-01-2021, 12:26 PM
Rootsy Rootsy is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Monroe, Michigan
Posts: 1,915
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gewehr43 View Post
So I'm considering joining this century and going optics.........
I've been playing around with them and winding my way thru the various options.......

So I appreciate your input....as with the others who have actually used them.

My question is this:

So idea goes that you need consistent head position/cheek weld etc or else you will introduce parallax issues.....parallax leads to opened groups or wandering zero--(for lack of better terms).....

But if the parallax is so small (so affect on groups).. then why worry about it?

So then, of course, within reason, why worry about forcing your head/eye into a particular spot? (So no need for the reducer).......?

In other words if the affect on groups by the question of parallax is so small, why worry about going thru all these steps to correct or eliminate it?
Parallax isnít the issue unless you have your eye alignment so off that the image is heavily shadowed and you are shooting very Close or very far. I once did a spreadsheet to calculate parallax and with a 24 mm objective and parallax set @ 300 yards maximum possible parallax error at 200 and 600 was only like 0.1 moa.

Varying head pressure and position creates varying loading on the rifle butt that causes shots to go where they were not aimed when you pull the trigger. With a huge field of view in a scope it is easy to get sloppy whereas with a .042 aperture it forces you to place your head consistently
__________________
Michigan Rifle & Pistol Assoc - State High Power Director
Distinguished Rifleman #2297
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-01-2021, 01:40 PM
Gewehr43 Gewehr43 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 3,243
Default

So I've also been reading the primer on the NM forum, which is quite good BTW.....

So short version:

So the parallax effect could be quite small, depending on the exact situation, but to minimize the variable as much as possible, you have several choices:

-choose a scope or modify so the parallax is set at, say 300yds, instead of say 100yds.
-For that matter choose one that has adjustable parallax.

-use one of these reducers to either:
+reduce the affect even more with the above.
+if you don't have a scope that is adjustable (or you haven't gotten it done).

-Or just rely on the idea that your cheek weld/head position is consistent enough and "drive on down the road....."
(because of course if you are really consistent, you have in effect, eliminated the parallax, because your head isn't changing shot to shot).

Is that in a nut-shell?

But you also bring up the idea of the FOV being too big generally...... Can you expand on that?
__________________
Service Rifle.... RIP .... 1884-2015

Last edited by Gewehr43; 01-01-2021 at 01:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-01-2021, 09:14 PM
HighpowerRifleBrony HighpowerRifleBrony is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 212
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gewehr43 View Post
But you also bring up the idea of the FOV being too big generally...... Can you expand on that?
My interpretation:

Some relationship of exit pupil and eye "box". The eye can be moved around the ideal focal point some while still maintaining a full, mostly clear image. C_Does and 9-Hole Reviews have some great optic review videos, often showcasing the eye "box".

Whereas moving the eye 0.020" from ideal alignment would be obvious with a 0.040" aperture and 3" eye relief, many scopes wouldn't show misalignment unless they're rigidly fixed and the parallax is way off, say 30yds when shooting at 300yds. The reticle is relatively small compared to the ~1.5" ocular lens.
__________________
Distinguished Rifleman #2223
"Technique isn't something that can be taught. It's something you find on your own." - Bunta Fujiwara
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-03-2021, 10:35 AM
jcj54 jcj54 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 70
Default

Having shot scope in smallbore matches for 40 years, I can attest that keeping your head and eye in the same spot is critical. I regularly shoot 50 yard conventional prone smallbore with the local gun Club in the summer and have blown shots in the 9 ring by failing to keep my head position consistent. Pretty disgusting to shoot a 199 25X because of the error.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-07-2021, 09:10 AM
Danny Danny is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 1,139
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gewehr43 View Post
So I'm considering joining this century and going optics.........
I've been playing around with them and winding my way thru the various options.......

So I appreciate your input....as with the others who have actually used them.

My question is this:

So idea goes that you need consistent head position/cheek weld etc or else you will introduce parallax issues.....parallax leads to opened groups or wandering zero--(for lack of better terms).....

But if the parallax is so small (so affect on groups).. then why worry about it?

So then, of course, within reason, why worry about forcing your head/eye into a particular spot? (So no need for the reducer).......?

In other words if the affect on groups by the question of parallax is so small, why worry about going thru all these steps to correct or eliminate it?
Nooooooooooo
__________________
Danny
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking for Rifles:
Springfield Armory 5,940,259, 5,840,184, 4,238,435 and 2,023,912.
Harrington & Richardson 5,549,399.

Aren't all handguards "UPPER"? If they were "LOWER", wouldn't they be "STOCK".

M1 Garand; Trigger Pack, Gas Tube?????????

"REPO" M1 Parts: The parts you buy that they come to take back later on.


"Furniture" is NOT stocks and handguards.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-09-2021, 07:03 PM
Gewehr43 Gewehr43 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 3,243
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danny View Post
Nooooooooooo
OK..... I'll play this game............

YYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSS

What did I win?
__________________
Service Rifle.... RIP .... 1884-2015
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:22 AM.