Go Back   CMP Forums > CMP Sales > M1 Carbine
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-05-2010, 10:51 PM
Waltherman Waltherman is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Macon, Ga.
Posts: 40
Default N-12 trigger group

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveHH View Post
spring of 1944 maybe in April in the last block. I think it should have a type 2 band. The recoil plate and receiver are certainly parked differently. Is that an Inland trigger?
Well the trigger group is marked N-12. How about it, is that a
Inland Trigger Group?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-06-2010, 12:45 AM
fwtrent fwtrent is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: South East
Posts: 299
Default

More detailed photos please...FWT
__________________
FT-Essayons!!!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-06-2010, 01:17 AM
DaveHH DaveHH is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4,705
Default There are 19 components in the "Trigger Group"

6 of which are marked by the maker. My NPM has an NPM made trigger housing but a Rockola hammer, an RIA sear and various other parts. Get my drift?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-06-2010, 05:58 AM
J.R.2009 J.R.2009 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Mt. Pleasant, SC
Posts: 8,250
Default

I have a trigger housing with a "12 - A" stamp. It's a Standard Products. All the Inland housings I have and have seen will have an Inland logo stamp on the right side. Some bigger than others, some vertical, some upside down, but I've never seen or heard of an Inland housing marked any other way. Could be something new?!
J.R.
__________________
J.R.

Home of the FREE Carbine Club Newsletter Index raeed4@comcast.net
I do NOT have newsletters to sell! ONLY our INDEX of what is in each issue. To get the issues see the link for the Carbine collectors Club.
http://www.uscarbinecal30.com/

USAF 379th Bomb Wing (Heavy) SAC
Gun Owners of SC
GCA
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-06-2010, 12:46 PM
Carbineitis Carbineitis is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Southeastern Michigan
Posts: 237
Default

The N-A mark on the rear sight base is consistent with an NPM rear sight. There should be another mark on the base, an S. With BQ97's feedback the stock would need to have an NPM stamp w/acceptance ordnance wheel to be closer to original.. IMO puts the carbine into the restored category..
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-06-2010, 07:56 PM
Waltherman Waltherman is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Macon, Ga.
Posts: 40
Default

Thanks for all the expert advise,
but for $500, I think I can live we the few
things wrong that you gents have pointed out.
Cheers!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:23 AM.