Field Grade – Insights welcomed as to what I received

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • WebSmithEddy
    • May 2016
    • 495

    Field Grade – Insights welcomed as to what I received

    It came clean and well-lubed. It looks like someone’s safe queen.



    More photos…

    No pitting! For that reason alone it is nicer than the FG I received this time last year (which I was still very happy with).

    A few dings and gouges in the stock. Some scratches to the finish on the magazine floor plate and on the trigger guard. Of course, that just adds character.

    I'm not sure about the rear sight, but everything else seems to fall into the July-August, 1943 range. I'm still new to this, so I only know what I've gleaned from the interwebs, so please enlighten me where I'm incorrect.

    The cartouches are faint, but it looks like a GAW stock.

    RA-P on the bottom of the stock (Raritan Arsenal, and perhaps the "P" is for Henry Peterson, the chief inspector between 1942 and 1946).

    Two P proof marks.

    According to the hang tag, the muzzle reading is 3 and the throat reading is 3+. Does the muzzle look like it has been recrowned? (see photos) I don’t have gauges, but the with the bullet test, it goes deeper than my other Garand. I’ll try and get out and shoot it this weekend, weather permitting. (UPDATE: It shoots great!)

    CMP Inspection date: 10-16-17. A white inventory tag was also attached to front sight.
    • SN: 1,833,XXX (August, 1943)
    • Receiver drawing #: D28291 28 (July, 1943? I could only find -27 and -29 listed online). Other receiver markings: O (or “C”) 43B<> and a “V” (or Roman numeral 5)
    • Barrel: 2-S-A-7-43 (July, 1943). A couple of other barrel markings look like “R” at different angles.
    • Bolt drawing #: D28287-12SA, Heat lot: S-06<> (August, 1943)
    • Oprod (uncut) D35382 6 SA (Oct, 1942-Dec, 1943). I didn’t get a photo of the op rod spring, but it was solid black.
    • Follower assembly: 11
    • Gas plug (well worn): Marked with a P and an O (Elastic Stop Nut Corp.)
    • Rear sight: PB (Pietro Beretta)
    • Trigger group: 028290-12-SA (Dec, 1942-Nov, 1944)
    • Hammer: C46008-5 SA (June, 1943-Aug, 1944)
    • Safety: C46015-9SA (Aug, 1942-Oct, 1943)

    .
    Last edited by WebSmithEddy; 12-13-2017, 09:12 AM.
  • Jakeroub
    • Dec 2016
    • 2200

    #2
    Very nice! I think RA-P is the Raritan Arsenal rebuild stamp!

    Comment

    • Jim-in-KS
      • Aug 2011
      • 269

      #3
      Looks like a lot of correct parts. Nice rifle.
      Now in Oklahoma!

      Comment

      • T38Carbine
        • Feb 2010
        • 5980

        #4
        I’d say you did quite well...nice rifle!! An uncut -6 op rod is a nice bonus!!

        Comment

        • OreoTSi
          • Apr 2011
          • 335

          #5
          Breech in the white and non-chromed pads for gas cylinder. That's awesome!
          Looking for M1 Garand SN: 2700285

          Comment

          • spalding
            • Sep 2017
            • 100

            #6
            Very nice FG.

            Comment

            • Orlando
              • Oct 2009
              • 11967

              #7
              Very nice, you did well
              "I am the master of my unspoken words, and a slave to those that should have remained unspoken. ...

              Comment

              • jerryjeff
                Banned
                • Oct 2009
                • 5838

                #8
                The original P was when it was manufactured. The plain P is the rebuild proof put on at Raritan. PB is Pierto Barreta(sp). Italian.

                Comment

                • SA1941
                  • Feb 2017
                  • 546

                  #9
                  Did good Eddy. Another great FG offering.

                  Comment

                  • Winnie
                    • Oct 2015
                    • 444

                    #10
                    Great rifle and great pics!
                    Looking for 2416903...

                    Comment

                    • budmant
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 1705

                      #11
                      Now, I will start by saying my eyes are not the greatest, but to me I see a very faint top of what might be an "AW"".
                      45 positive feedbacks before the change

                      Comment

                      • Fogtripper
                        • Oct 2009
                        • 3268

                        #12
                        Originally posted by budmant View Post
                        Now, I will start by saying my eyes are not the greatest, but to me I see a very faint top of what might be an "AW"".
                        Yup, I was going to post GAW.

                        Comment

                        • caseywk
                          • Mar 2015
                          • 389

                          #13
                          I would say you scored big time. It looks as if it’s mostly correct except a few parts. And the finish matches very well. I would be more than pleased to get a field grade in near condition. Congrats on the nice rifle.

                          Best regards,
                          Casey
                          Regards,
                          Casey

                          Comment

                          • WebSmithEddy
                            • May 2016
                            • 495

                            #14
                            Originally posted by budmant View Post
                            Now, I will start by saying my eyes are not the greatest, but to me I see a very faint top of what might be an "AW"".
                            Originally posted by Fogtripper View Post
                            Yup, I was going to post GAW.
                            I took it outside to get some better pictures of the cartouches. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it does seem to be a GAW.





                            .

                            Comment

                            • WebSmithEddy
                              • May 2016
                              • 495

                              #15
                              Range Report

                              Got it out to the range this weekend. It did great. The first photo is at 25 yards, shooting on sandbags. The first 3 were right on the money. And the following 5 (second photo) were right there with them. (HXP-78)

                              The clip didn’t eject with the last round, but it was a parkerized one right out of a bandoleer. The next clip had been tumbled and did eject, but didn’t go very far.

                              I went to the steel range with it and hit at least 3 out of 8 at 185 yards on a silhouette target. I might have done better, but it was late in the afternoon and I had trouble picking the gray steel out of the shadows of the trees beside the berm.





                              .

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X