Go Back   CMP Forums > CMP Sales > M1A/M14
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-09-2022, 02:18 PM
jimthompson502002 jimthompson502002 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: La Crosse, Wisconsin
Posts: 3,032
Default

It's not an M1A. That's a proprietary model name for SAI only. It's an M-14SA, or M14, or variant thereof. Sometimes M14S....

Some of the Chinese rifles were shipped as "M305" and so on. But NEVER as an M1A, which is a copyrighted brand-name based title. Polytech and Norinco ( the old Mukden facility, re-named ) varied the design details of their forged receivers in very interesting ways.

SAI ( Springfield Armory, Incorporated ) suggested that it might be some kind of mistake or violation to call their cast M14 spinoff by the name of the old military rifle. If ATF ever so ruled, no one can locate the evidence. The implication, obviously mistaken, that "any M14 is a "machine gun" was foisted as their cover story at the time.

If one calls it an "M1A" on Federal or some state paperwork, it's an error and can be a violation.

Very nice stock, and yes, worth restoration.

https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...ech_logo-1.jpg

Last edited by jimthompson502002; 01-09-2022 at 02:28 PM. Reason: image and details
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-09-2022, 03:07 PM
Rambler1 Rambler1 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimthompson502002 View Post
It's not an M1A. That's a proprietary model name for SAI only. It's an M-14SA, or M14, or variant thereof. Sometimes M14S....

Some of the Chinese rifles were shipped as "M305" and so on. But NEVER as an M1A, which is a copyrighted brand-name based title. Polytech and Norinco ( the old Mukden facility, re-named ) varied the design details of their forged receivers in very interesting ways.

SAI ( Springfield Armory, Incorporated ) suggested that it might be some kind of mistake or violation to call their cast M14 spinoff by the name of the old military rifle. If ATF ever so ruled, no one can locate the evidence. The implication, obviously mistaken, that "any M14 is a "machine gun" was foisted as their cover story at the time.

If one calls it an "M1A" on Federal or some state paperwork, it's an error and can be a violation.

Very nice stock, and yes, worth restoration.

https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...ech_logo-1.jpg
Jim,
I posted M1a in quotation marks to denote the fact that it was not an M1a. I apologize for any confusion that I might have created. In the future I will be more accurate with my language in my description of firearms. I guess the last thing I need is to get in trouble for not calling a gun by its correct name. Lets just hope that SAIs Attorney is asleep at the wheel.
CL
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-04-2022, 09:14 AM
navyrifleman navyrifleman is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,387
Default

How did your stock refinishing project turn out?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:39 AM.