![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That makes sense as Hackberry is considered a member of the Elm family.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() https://photos.app.goo.gl/iswjTGx7YUeZjsLAA Oh well, just click the links...can't seem to make google display the image... Last edited by dkarpisek; 03-23-2019 at 10:59 AM. Reason: PB won't allow image linking...still havent changed to another service. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() NICE!!! |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
While the collector types want the military wood, these rifles were given a new lease on life with new wood. I see them as still very useful rifles entering a new time of service in the civilian world. Why not a nice looking stock? I might prefer a somewhat darker finish so as not to stand out on the woods; but the natural hackberry really looks good.
Just wondering (I'm not a wood expert), is there a good reason why the buttstock cavities aren't drilled out for the cleaning kit? Just cost-cutting? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's the only downside of the Hackberry stocks as far as I'm concerned. I wish mine was drilled too - but I'm scared to try it myself!
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a CMP IHC rifle that has a hackberry stock. I believe the hand guards are original to the rifle. Would like to get the stock to match more closely. Your pics look good but would you have any recommendations on a stain to get the stock a little darker in color.
I do not want to do anything to the hand guards obviously Thanks |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can certainly use a darker stain, I think that's your best hope, but it's going to take some trial and error.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|